Hello readers welcome....
This is our classroom activity to write something about the the waste land so here task is given to write first about the views by Nietzsche and Eliot. View are given upon the mythology which Eliot used in his present poem.Second thing to write upon Freud and Eliot's views. And last is to give some glimpse on Indian philosophy or thought which Eliot taken from Indian thought into poem. So here is task....for more information you can click here
Introduction :
The Waste land is written by T. S. Eliot. This poem consist five part.
1) The Burial of the Dead.
2) A Game of Chess.
3) The Fire Sermon.
4) Death by Water.
5) What the Thunder Said.
Present poem is considered as an Epic. But it is a modern epic.some way it's characteristics is match with epic but someway so it's modern epic. This poem consist about 434 lines. Eliot also connect myth into this poem. Like Tiresias, God Apollo, Tristan, syble. He also learnt Sanskrit so he also woven Indian thoughts and Indian philosophy in this poem which we can Find in Third The Fire sermon and last part What is the Thunder said as well . He takes some element from Brihadarnya Upnishad and also from Bhuddha and some myth which is we get around him.so that's why we can put this great poem into category of an epic but in modern Epic. Eliot used five language( English, German, French, Italian and Sanskrit) and three religion( Budhdha,,Hindu and christian) concept in this poem.
Here I discussed about the views by Nietzsche and Eliot .second topic or quotation is about Freud and Eliot. So let's see....
(1) What are your views on the following image after reading "The waste land"? Do you think that Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzsche's views? or has Eliot achieved universality of thought by recalling mytho-historical answer to the contemporary malaise?
From this picture we come to know that this both have different point of views for the superman ,god myth and so on. So they are stand opposite side to make arguments.
We always heard that never look back and moving further. So Friedrich Nietzsche is arguing about that we should go or move further and find the solution of the problem with which are comes on our path. So some way it is right .
But when we see the Eliot's view we have some other view as well and it will make every one to think upon which view is very much appreciate or can say right.
Eliot is looking back and gave not only resolution but also solution.In his poem The Waste Land he used myth and mythological element. That way he is regressive and and also looking back.
So now time is that what we think on this view ?
According to me time is keep on moving or can say time cycle is moving eternally. So we always see and look further but when we see some problem we have some example from myth about that mythical character 'S experience. So it will be useful for taking decision. We have not that much life to make every mistake in our life and find out its solution so we can see back and peep into myth or also in our own life to make future good enough to take right or which should be done for that.
So, it tell to who is right here I like to say that we should use both and try to make our further life good and find out solution from to thinking. Nietzsche believe in superman but when we talk it will be not a good thing.Ex Hitler. While other side T. S. Eliot make balance of swing, swing of regress and progress. His view is universal into his poem.
(2) What are your views regarding these comments Is it true that giving free vent to the repressed 'primitive instinct' lead us to happy and satisfied life? or do you agree with Eliot's view that 'salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition'?'
It is true that free vent to the repressed ‘primitive instincts’ lead us to happy and satisfied life’ but it will be upon to the person that how is he or she giving that space to own self. Because it will can be creat a problem or can say anarchy which Arnold used in his essay Culture and Anarchy. There we can see a chapter about. 'Doing as one like'.
According to Eliot if there is any kind of anarchy will be there we can find it's solution from the preserve culture or from tradition as well.
So when we talk about free vent it is depends on person that he will not misuse of it otherwise it will create chaos. As Eliot say that we can peep into back, into preserve culture it will help and balanced the thing.
(3) Write about allusions to the Indian thoughts in 'The Waste Land'. (Where, How and Why are the Indian thoughts referred?)
' The Waste land' Eliot used Indian philosophy as well in this poem. In the third part we can find the Buddhism and in the last part we can see the some elements from the Upnishad.
Eliot uses the three “Da” taken from “Brihadaranyaka Upanishad".
1.) Datta – giver
It means to give other
2.) Dayadhvam – compassion
It means to be symaptis or feel others sorrow and give support. Poet give the metaphor of key ,lock prison and nightfall.
3.) Damyata – self-control
It means to control our own self .here metaphor is Boat, sail sea and oar.
Eliot used some metaphor to give it's understanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment